JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 18, 2012

A- de 2012

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Presidencia

✓Claimant Liliana Marcela Hernandez Gordillo Vs Sala Segunda De Revision De La Corte Constitucional

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra Sala De Revision De La Corte Constitucional
  • Archivar por haberse proferido sentencia T-281/12
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto se decide archivar el escrito que contiene la acción de tutela de la referencia, la cual había sido radicada ante la Corte Suprema de Justicia quien se abstuvo de decidir sobre el caso y decidió remitirlas a la Corte Constitucional, tras considerar que la acusación presentada en la demanda no guardaba relación con la actividad de cierre que cumple la Corporación.

El archivo se ordenó luego de constatar que el amparo invocado quedó sin sustento, luego de que la Sala de Revisión accionada, mediante sentencia T-281A/12, definió la revisión de la acción de tutela a la que acudió la actora en contra de la universidad de Los Andes

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. ARCHIVAR por Secretaria General, el escrito que contiene la accion de tutela incoada por Liliana Marcela Hernandez Gordillo, en contra de la Sala Segunda de Revision de la Corte Constitucional.
  2. Segundo. INFORMAR por Secretaria General a la senora Liliana Marcela Hernandez Gordillo, sobre lo resuelto en esta providencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.